September 15, 2016 Comments (0) Uncategorized

Performance-Based Higher Education Funding Debated in Missouri


Since the adoption of the No Child Left out Act, former President George W Bush’s federal education initiative, funding according to student performance has become standard practice in much of K-12 education. Now, based on Allison Prang of the Columbia Missourian, Missouri is looking to expand that evaluation and funding practice to raised education.

Although an agenda to fund the public university system within the state according to student outcomes was rejected in the General Assembly during the last session, the sponsor from the bill, Senator David Pearce of Warrensburg, already asserted he intends to introduce it again this fall. The Pearce proposal wouldn’t be considered a drastic shift C only 10% of the funding would be based on performance C but it could easily set the program for broader policies down the road.

Missouri started in the future toward performance funding in January when Gov. Jay Nixon proposed $34 million of recent funding for schools that met performance criteria the Missouri Department better Education helped set,?based on a previous Missourian article.?Those criteria included retention for freshmen and sophomores, degree completion, financial responsibility and particular measures that every school produced for itself, according to?a report in the Coordinating Board for Higher Education.

Pearce, who is the chairman from the Joint Committee of Education, then introduced a stride that was in large part based on a report through the committee with setting funding levels to performance and discovering that compared to other public university systems round the country, their state was underfunding its university system by near to $400 million.

Performance-based funding in higher ed predictably hasn’t been warmly received by everyone. Democratic Representative Chris Kelly of Columbia dismissed the balance as a distraction, saying that legislators were focusing on performance simply because they wanted to draw attention away from the fact that they’re hesitant to fund their public university system.

But the opposition isn’t just in the opposite side from the ideological aisle. Senator Kurt Schaefer, a Republican from Columbia, filibustered Pearce’s bill when it came up for a vote in the state Senate.

The National Conference of State Legislatures in 2012 issued a study?spelling out where all 50 states were on performance-based funding. It said 12 states already have some sort of performance-funding policy, and the other 12, including Missouri, are on your journey to it.?Julie Bell, education group director for that conference, said performance funding slowly became popular in recent years as lawmakers confronted with tight state budgets sought more accountability.?Performance-based funding models vary widely among states. Bell said that because most of the policies are relatively new, there\’s insufficient to data to find out whether they’re effective.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *